Commercial Law

Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017

The Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017 (Bill) was introduced by the House of Representatives on 1 March 2017.  A report of the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee is presently due by 9 May 2017.  It is anticipated that the Bill (in its current form or otherwise with amendments) will receive Royal Assent later this year.

The Bill addresses the findings of various well publicised reports regarding the exploitation of workers (including migrant workers under temporary work visas).  Briefly, the measures to be introduced include:

  1. Higher penalties[1] for “serious contraventions[2]” of various workplace laws[3] (to act as a deterrent);
  2. Prohibitions against employers unreasonably requiring their employees to make payments (e.g. requiring their wages to be paid back in cash);
  3. Making franchisors and holding companies[4] potentially liable for underpayments by their franchisees or subsidiaries where they “knew or could reasonably be expected to have known” that the contraventions, or similar contraventions, would at least be likely to occur and failed to take reasonable steps[5] to prevent them;
  4. Higher penalties for record keeping failures; and
  5. Increased evidence gathering / investigatory powers of the Fair Work Ombudsman.

The following activities are examples of some reasonable steps which could be taken by franchisors and holding companies (who have a significant degree of influence or control over their franchisees or subsidiaries) to try to avoid a contravention of the Bill (if and when enacted), depending on the size and influence of the relevant franchisor or holding company:

………………………

[1] Up to $108,000 for individuals and $540,000 for corporations

[2] Where the conduct constituting the contravention was deliberate (i.e. expressly, tacitly, or impliedly authorised) and part of a systematic pattern of conduct bearing in mind the number of contraventions, the period of time during which the contraventions occurred, the effect of the contraventions, and any other relevant considerations

[3] e.g. contravening the National Employment Standards, a modern award, enterprise agreement, workplace determination, national minimum wage order, equal remuneration order, certain payment related provisions and record provisions

[4] Who have a significant degree of influence or control over the affairs of their franchisee or subsidiary

[5] The court will take into account factors such as the size and resources of the franchisor or holding company, their ability to influence or control, any action taken to ensure that the franchisee or subsidiary knew about their obligations under the specific workplace laws, any arrangements in place for assessing compliance with the specific workplace laws, whether there are any complaints related arrangements in place, and the extent to which compliance with the specific workplace laws is encouraged or required by the franchisor or holding company

Speak with us

Need advice on this issue? Speak directly with a senior lawyer today — +61 2 9358 5527.

This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. You should obtain advice specific to your circumstances before acting. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Related insights
Leave it with us

Speak directly with a senior lawyer.

Tell us about your matter and get a straight answer — including a fixed-fee quote where we can offer one.

+61 2 9358 5527
Send an enquiry

    By submitting you agree to our Website Terms and Privacy Policy.